“As a general concept, I don’t mind the idea of breaking it down into operable units, so that work can be done effectively in one place,” says Jim Robison, chairman of the Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group, EPA’s officially designated citizens panel. The idea of breaking the 10-mile site into smaller Superfund projects has long been discussed, Robison says.
However, he adds, “I wouldn’t want that to be an avenue for them to do less of an effective cleanup.”
Reported in The Yakima Herald-Republic by Kate Prengaman: http://www.yakimaherald.com/news/local/cleanup-plans-for-portland-harbor...
Additonal Report at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/08/08/fish-protect-fail-y...
Yakama Nation leaders traveled to Washington D.C. this week to urge the federal Environmental Protection Agency to improve its plans for cleaning up the Portland Harbor Superfund site.
Click here to view the EPA Fact Sheet and summary of the Proposed Plan (8 pages, 1MB), or click here to download the full PDF version of the EPA's Portland Harbor Proposed Plan (151 pages, 23MB). Additional information and details can be found at the links on this site and at http://go.usa.gov/3Wf2B
The Plan is currently being reviewed by multiple organizations and individuals. As we have more material available, we will post that here. Click here to see an initial list of concerns raised by Dr. Peter deFur, technical consultant working with the Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group and Willamette Riverkeepers.
You may use this form below (courtesy of http://www.cleanupportlandharbor.org/) to submit your own comment to EPA. Write your own comments in your own words highlighting what you feel are the most important points to raise. Be specific when you can.
Dear Ms. McCarthy,
The proposed cleanup of Portland Harbor is a big win for industry and a bad deal for the public. EPA’s cleanup proposal tackles just 8% of a site area that is 100% toxic. A more aggressive plan is needed to prevent even more harm to human health and the environment. On behalf of all people who rely on the river for food, recreation, employment and culture, I urge the EPA to implement a plan that:
These elements get us closer to the plan our communities deserve. And I deserve a clean, safe Portland Harbor.
These elements get us closer to the plan our communities deserve.
And I deserve a clean, safe Portland Harbor.
Diverse coalition condemns EPA’s Portland Harbor cleanup plan Group urges action at cleanPDXharbor.orgSubmitted by CAGAdmin on Tue, 06/28/2016 - 09:34
Portland, OR— A coalition of diverse community groups held a press conference Friday to condemn the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) plan to clean up the Portland Harbor Superfund site. The plan, proposed on June 8th, would leave 92 percent of the 11-mile stretch of the Willamette River toxic to people and wildlife indefinitely.
As reported by OPB:
Chevron, Gunderson, NW Natural, Union Pacific Railroad, Evraz Inc., Arkema and TOC Holdings Co. filed a legal dispute with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
As reported in the Portland Tribune by Bianca Pahl:
The Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group held a public forum Tuesday night at Hariet Tubman Middle School to provide a better understanding for the community about the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund plan to decontaminate certain areas of the Willamette River.
Dr. Peter deFur, technical consultant providing review of the Superfund Proposed Plan for the Portland Harbor Community Advisory Group, at a public forum on Tuesday, June 21st, presented what he sees as issues for the community to pay particular attention to, in our review and for comments to the EPA. Attached is the PowerPoint presentation from Dr. deFur.
Issues of concern in the initial ESC analysis of FS and Proposed Plan, including elements from the 2015 Proposed Plan. 6-21-2016